Zuru sees damages doubled following 2017 patent infringement case

Published on: 2nd April 2019

Telebrands was accused of “serial infringement” through a series of variations on what is essentially a copy of the Bunch O Balloons product.

Genuine Bunch O Balloons products.

A Texas federal judge has doubled a 2017 jury award to $24.5m and tacked on $4.75m in attorney fees and expenses for Zuru after it won a case against Telebrands Corp. for infringing two patents on a water balloon device.

The two patents Telebrands infringed upon were licensed to Zuru for its Bunch O Balloons product, which allows users to fill up to 100 balloons with water simultaneously. It was found during the trial that the infringer had attempted to subtly alter the original product design in an effort to bypass injunctions blocking sales of previous products. According to the lawsuit, Telebrands became aware of Bunch O Balloons through Kickstarter and created a series of copies; Balloon Bonanza, Easy Einstein Balloons and Battle Balloons. All are currently subject to a federal injunction.

In doubling the award, Judge Schroeder came down hard on Telebrands for wasting court resources. It was found that the company filed misleading emergency motions, was slow to comply with discovery requests and caused the court to expend excess resources by filing non-meritous motions.

Bunch O Balloons inventor Josh Malone commented: “I do not expect them to pay. Telebrands and its retail cohorts have been stealing from inventors for 40 years and it never pays.”


Friday Blog

Innocent until proven guilty …it’s the Friday Blog!

Little Tikes unveils toys based on ‘Let’s Go Cozy Coupe’

Kidicraft bolsters team with two new appointments

Exclusive: embracing Plush

Exclusive: NPD Insight half way through 2022

IMC Toys opens Australian subsidiary

Kids India 2022 to make Indian toy market more accessible

Moonbug announces new content deal with BBC

Toys4You Sutton Coldfield becomes Toymaster member

Lego to stage two-day immersive Mission to Mars event